The very first comment says: "To find a woman you need Time and Money." Assuming that that statement is true in and of itself - and this is important as everything that follows is deduced from this one proposition the laid out example is still wrong.
It should be Woman = Time + Money. Not Woman = Time * Money.
And even that is incorrect. It's not that a woman is Time * Money but that FINDING A WOMAN is time * money.
Another problem is that the statement "Woman=Times*Money", in this example, implies that there aren't other factors in finding a woman, or if they are they are insignificant compared the factors Time and Money.
Finally we haven't ascertained if Woman pertains to all women, most women or some women. Meaning, are there any women to which this statement doesn't hold true. For example, when we look at a statistical analysis we don't take the resultant as a hard and fact TRUTH. It's understood that, at best, it holds true for, say 95% of the time, and even then there is a little play.
Of course a joke is not meant to be parsed so closely.
I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my telephone. My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone. -Bjarne Stroustrup (developed C++)
Efficiency stems more from good design than from good coding. - Robert L. Glass
More computing sins are committed in the name of [execution] efficiency (often without achieving it) than for any other single reason, including blind stupidity. - W.A.Wulf
Focusing too heavily on optimization techniques often results in code that is difficult or impossible to understand and maintain. - Eric M. Burke
If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas. - George Bernard Shaw
In preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable. - Dwight D. Eisenhower
The wonderful thing about standards is that we have so many of them to choose from.
Maybe it's because I'm not a geek but where is it wrong?
ReplyDeleteThe very first comment says: "To find a woman you need Time and Money." Assuming that that statement is true in and of itself - and this is important as everything that follows is deduced from this one proposition the laid out example is still wrong.
ReplyDeleteIt should be Woman = Time + Money. Not Woman = Time * Money.
And even that is incorrect. It's not that a woman is Time * Money but that FINDING A WOMAN is time * money.
Another problem is that the statement "Woman=Times*Money", in this example, implies that there aren't other factors in finding a woman, or if they are they are insignificant compared the factors Time and Money.
Finally we haven't ascertained if Woman pertains to all women, most women or some women. Meaning, are there any women to which this statement doesn't hold true. For example, when we look at a statistical analysis we don't take the resultant as a hard and fact TRUTH. It's understood that, at best, it holds true for, say 95% of the time, and even then there is a little play.
Of course a joke is not meant to be parsed so closely.
Wow. you must be a geek to come up with that answer.
ReplyDelete